The parties heretofore entered into a consent order resolving their differences as to child custody and support. Heard in the Court of Appeals 30 August 1983. Judgment entered in District Court, Hyde County. The trial court did not err in reducing the amount of child support which a court order required defendant father to pay from $275.00 per month to $150.00 per month where the court found that, although the needs of the child remained unchanged, defendant is unable to contribute more than $150.00 per month for child support due to his present financial condition, and such amount is a reasonable sum considering the estates, earnings, conditions and customary standard of living of the child and the parties, and where this finding was supported by evidence that defendant’s income has decreased because of the loss of his job as an air traffic controller when he refused to cross a picket line, defendant has borrowed substantial sums in operating a motel and a bar, the motel and bar have both lost money, and plaintiff mother’s income has increased substantially.ĪPPEAL by plaintiff from Ward, Judge. Divorce and Alimony § 24.7- modification of child support order - changed circumstances 50-13.7(a) upon a showing of changed circumstances.Ģ. ![]() ![]() Where the trial court adopted a consent judgment for child support as its own determination of the rights of the parties, the judgment is subject to modification under G.S. Divorce and Alimony § 24.5- child support - consent judgment - modification for changed circumstances WYNNĬHRISTINE O’NEAL, formerly CHRISTINE O’NEAL WYNN v. ![]() CHRISTINE O'NEAL, formerly CHRISTINE O'NEAL WYNN v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |